Did Muhammad Exist? A Critical Examination of Historical and Archaeological Evidence

By: Brian S

Exploring Manuscripts, Inscriptions, and Non-Islamic Sources on the Origins of Islam

Did Muhammad really exist? This in-depth analysis examines historical records, early manuscripts, and archaeological evidence to separate fact from speculation in the origins of Islam.

      Illustrative image

The question of whether Muhammad, the founder of Islam, actually existed has intrigued historians, theologians, and skeptics alike. While the overwhelming scholarly consensus affirms Muhammad’s historicity, a minority of revisionist scholars have questioned it, citing gaps in the early Islamic record and the late compilation of traditional sources. This article examines the evidence for Muhammad’s existence, distinguishing well-substantiated historical data from speculative theories.

The Traditional Islamic Narrative

Islamic tradition holds that Muhammad ibn Abdullah was born in Mecca around 570 CE. At age 40, he began receiving divine revelations through the angel Gabriel, later compiled into the Quran. His monotheistic teachings challenged Meccan polytheism, leading to his migration (Hijra) to Medina in 622 CE—an event marking the start of the Islamic calendar. By the time of his death in 632 CE, much of the Arabian Peninsula had embraced Islam (Donner, 2010, p. 28).

This narrative derives from Islamic sources such as the Quran, Hadith (reports of Muhammad’s sayings and actions), and early biographies like Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah, written in the 8th century and preserved through Ibn Hisham’s recension. However, the fact that these accounts were compiled decades after Muhammad’s death has led some scholars to scrutinize their reliability (Berg, 2003, p. 113).

Evidence Supporting Muhammad’s Historical Existence

Non-Islamic Contemporary Sources

Near-contemporary non-Muslim texts corroborate the presence of an Arabian prophetic figure. A Syriac chronicle from 634 CE—just two years after Muhammad’s traditional death—mentions an Arab prophet leading military campaigns (Hoyland, 1997, p. 120). The Armenian chronicler Sebeos (660s CE) explicitly refers to “Muhammad” as a merchant and preacher who taught the Arabs about the God of Abraham (Howard-Johnston, 1999, p. 188). Greek sources such as the Doctrina Jacobi further describe Arab invasions led by a “prophet” (Hoyland, 2018, p. 33).

Archaeological and Epigraphic Evidence

Physical artifacts affirm Muhammad’s existence. The Zuhayr inscription (644 CE), one of the oldest Islamic inscriptions, commemorates his death (al-Jallad & Sidky, 2022, p. 5), while a Ta’if inscription dated to 24 AH (644 CE) explicitly refers to “Muhammad the Prophet of God” (Ghabban & Hoyland, 2008, p. 218). The Dome of the Rock (691 CE) also bears his name, reflecting his enduring influence (Hoyland, 2018, p. 97).

The Quran as Historical Evidence

The Quran, widely accepted as a 7th-century text, reflects an emerging religious movement centered on a prophetic leader. Carbon dating of early manuscripts, such as the Birmingham Quran (c. 568–645 CE), supports its 7th-century provenance (Déroche, 2020, p. 89). Its oral composition and thematic coherence suggest origins within Muhammad’s lifetime (Neuwirth, 2019, p. 76). Additionally, the Quran’s engagement with Syriac biblical narratives underscores its historical context (Witztum, 2019, p. 45).

The Islamic Conquests as Contextual Evidence

The rapid 7th-century expansion of Islam implies a unifying leader. Kennedy (2007, p. 112) highlights the organizational coherence of early military campaigns, which align with Muhammad’s reported role as a religious and political figure.

The Skeptical Perspective

Lack of Contemporary Islamic Documentation

No documents from Muhammad’s lifetime explicitly name him, and the earliest detailed Islamic biographies emerge over a century after his death. Revisionists like Crone and Cook (1977, p. 8) argue that early Islamic history was mythologized, though this view is critiqued for relying on speculative interpretations (Motzki, 2000, p. 170).

Alternative Theories on Early Islam’s Origins

Crone and Cook (1977) proposed that Islam arose from a fusion of Judeo-Christian and Arabian traditions. However, Crone (2008, p. 27) later acknowledged Muhammad’s existence while urging caution about traditional biographies.

Assessing the Evidence: Key Considerations

1. Oral Tradition: 7th-century Arabia relied on oral transmission, with memorization preserving historical information (Schoeler, 2006, pp. 62–65).
2. Comparative Historical Figures: Skepticism toward Muhammad would necessitate questioning figures like Laozi, whose historicity is accepted despite limited evidence (Shoemaker, 2012, p. 273).
3. Methodological Consistency: Historians of late antiquity emphasize that demanding “contemporary proof” for Muhammad is anachronistic (Humphreys, 2021, p. 114).
4. Scholarly Consensus: Most historians, Muslim and non-Muslim, accept Muhammad’s existence while debating biographical details (Robinson, 2003, p. 218).

Implications for Understanding Early Islam

The evidence affirming Muhammad’s existence not only addresses historical curiosity but also enriches our understanding of Islam’s formative period. The Quran’s engagement with Syriac Christian narratives, as noted by Witztum (2019, p. 45), situates early Islamic theology within the broader context of Late Antique religious discourse. This interplay suggests that Muhammad’s teachings were both innovative and responsive to existing theological currents, reflecting a dynamic interaction with neighboring faith traditions (Ahmed, 2016, p. 139).

Furthermore, the organizational coherence of the early Islamic conquests, underscored by Kennedy (2007, p. 112), implies a centralized leadership that aligns with traditional accounts of Muhammad’s political and military role. The rapid consolidation of power after his death, evidenced by inscriptions like the Zuhayr text (al-Jallad & Sidky, 2022, p. 5), challenges revisionist claims that Islam emerged from a fragmented or mythologized past.

Addressing Common Misconceptions

A persistent misconception is that the lack of contemporaneous Islamic documents invalidates Muhammad’s historicity. However, as Humphreys (2021, p. 114) notes, demanding “contemporary proof” for figures in pre-literate societies is methodologically inconsistent. Comparatively, figures like Laozi or even early Christian leaders are accepted based on later textual and contextual evidence (Shoemaker, 2012, p. 273).

Another myth posits that early Islam was entirely derivative of Judeo-Christian traditions. While Crone and Cook (1977, p. 8) initially emphasized syncretism, subsequent scholarship has highlighted Islam’s distinct theological innovations, particularly its reconfiguration of monotheism within an Arabian context (Neuwirth, 2019, p. 76).

Conclusion

The question of Muhammad’s existence transcends academic debate, offering critical insights into the origins of one of history’s most influential movements. The cumulative weight of non-Islamic chronicles, 7th-century inscriptions, the Quran’s textual coherence, and the logistical achievements of the Islamic conquests collectively affirm Muhammad’s role as a historical figure. While gaps in the record persist—common to many figures of antiquity—the interdisciplinary convergence of evidence leaves little room for reasonable doubt.

Scholarly inquiry now focuses not on whether Muhammad existed but on refining our understanding of his life and legacy. Advances in archaeology, manuscript studies, and comparative historiography promise to further illuminate the socio-political and theological landscape of 7th-century Arabia. By distinguishing evidence from speculation, we honor both the complexity of early Islamic history and the enduring legacy of its foundational figure.

References

Ahmed, S. (2016) What is Islam? The importance of being Islamic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Al-Jallad, A. and Sidky, H. (2022) ‘A paleo-Arabic inscription on the route of the Himyarite King Abraha’, Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 33(1), pp. 1–12.

Berg, H. (2003) Method and theory in the study of Islamic origins. Leiden: Brill.

Crone, P. (2008) ‘What do we actually know about Muhammad?’, Open Articles in Islamic Studies, 31(4), pp. 1–30.

Crone, P. and Cook, M. (1977) Hagarism: The making of the Islamic world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Déroche, F. (2020) The Quran in history: A survey of manuscript traditions. London: Bloomsbury.

Donner, F.M. (2010) Muhammad and the believers: At the origins of Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ghabban, A.I. and Hoyland, R. (2008) ‘The inscription of Zuhayr, the oldest Islamic inscription (24 AH/AD 644–645)’, Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 19(2), pp. 210–237.

Howard-Johnston, J. (1999) ‘Armenian historians of Heraclius: An examination of the aims, sources, and working methods of Sebeos and Movses Daskhurants’i’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 23(1), pp. 187–218.

Hoyland, R.G. (1997) Seeing Islam as others saw it: A survey and evaluation of Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrian writings on early Islam. Princeton: Darwin Press.

Hoyland, R.G. (2018) In God’s path: The Arab conquests and the creation of an Islamic empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Humphreys, R.S. (2021) Islamic history: A framework for inquiry. 2nd edn. London: I.B. Tauris.

Kennedy, H. (2007) The great Arab conquests: How the spread of Islam changed the world we live in. Philadelphia: Da Capo Press.

Motzki, H. (2000) ‘The murder of Ibn Abi l-Huqayq: On the origin and reliability of some Maghazi reports’, in Motzki, H. (ed.) The biography of Muhammad: The issue of the sources. Leiden: Brill, pp. 170–239.

Neuwirth, A. (2019) The Qur’an and late antiquity: A shared heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Robinson, C.F. (2003) Islamic historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schoeler, G. (2006) The oral and the written in early Islam. London: Routledge.

Shoemaker, S.J. (2012) The death of a prophet: The end of Muhammad’s life and the beginnings of Islam. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Witztum, J. (2019) ‘The Syriac milieu of the Quran: The recasting of biblical narratives’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 78(1), pp. 45–64.

Copyright © 2025 www.zentnutri.blogspot.com. All Rights Reserved.